French Supreme Court specifies the conditions under which GPS may be used to monitor an employee
Estimated reading time 3 minutes
It was held by the French Supreme Court that a company had unlawfully used a GPS device to track the company car of one of its employees.
Background
An employee working as a sales representative was informed by his employer that his company car would be equipped with a GPS for the purpose of reviewing his trips and optimising his visits to clients. Several months later the employee claimed constructive dismissal on the ground that his employer had used the data collected by the GPS to reduce his remuneration.
The Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court upheld the employee’s claim.
The use of a GPS that collects personal data must be declared to the French data protection administration (the “Commission National de l’Informatique et des Libertés” or “CNIL”). In the notification to CNIL the employer must clearly specify the purpose of the system that is, the potential use of the personal data collected via the system. The use of a GPS for a purpose other than the one declared to the CNIL exposes the employer to criminal penalties. The Supreme Court ruled that the use of a GPS for a purpose other than the reason indicated to the data protection administration is a violation of the law and the data so collected may not be used against the employee.
The Supreme Court also said that using a GPS to check the working hours of an employee is only permissible if such a check cannot be done by other means. In this case it was held that the use of a GPS to monitor the employee’s working time was not justifiable when the employee’s employment contract permitted the employee to freely organise his work schedule.
Resources:
Cass. Soc. 3 November 2011 No. 10-18.036 Société Moreau Incendies contre Decaen, RJS 1/12
For further information or to discuss any of the issues raised, please contact Pascal Ngatsing on +33 (0)1 43 59 43 12.
Disclaimer
Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.
Circular 230 disclosure
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this article (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Copying
If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.